15 - 21 October 1917

Revolutionaries remove the remaining relics of the Imperial Regime from the facade of official buildings, Petrograd © IWM (Q 69406)
15 October
Letter
to Nicholas II from his sister Xenia, from Ai-Todor, Crimea
They have removed our guard, many sailors asked for leave, some asked to
return to Sebastopol, i.e. they were ‘thoroughly fed up’ being here. At first
we had many misunderstandings with them, but finally we all got used to each
other and they understood that we are neither criminals, nor are we involved in
propaganda! But the thought of how you must grieve and suffer for our poor
dearly beloved country and army — makes my heart ache and bleed. What have they
done to us? Why destroy everything?
(Sergei Mironenko, A Lifelong Passion, London 1996)
16
October
Memoir by the Menshevik Nikolai Sukhanov
The Military Revolutionary Committee was an apparatus for the overthrow of
the Government and the seizure of power by the Bolsheviks. And on October 16th
this ‘motion’ was presented to the Soviet plenum for approval. There were
heated protests from a Menshevik orator, whose fraction, in this meeting of a
thousand men, numbered fifty people. ‘The Bolsheviks won’t answer the straight
question whether or not they are preparing a coup. This is either cowardice or
lack of confidence in their own strength’ (laughter in the audience). ‘But the
projected Military Revolutionary Committee is nothing but a revolutionary staff
for the seizure of power…’
(N.N. Sukhanov, The Russian Revolution 1917: a Personal Record, Oxford
1955)
What
Lenin wanted was a formal endorsement of the previous decision [in favour of
insurrection], though one leaving open the form and precise timing of
insurrection … Zinoviev, by contrast, called for flatly prohibiting the
organising of an uprising before the Second Congress … For Zinoviev, six
votes for, fifteen against, three abstentions. For Lenin, four abstentions, two
opposed, and nineteen in favour … Though the schedule was still up for
debate, for the second time in a week the Bolsheviks had voted for
insurrection … in Novaya zhizn … Kamenev published a stunning attack:
‘At the present … the instigation of an armed uprising before and
independent of the Soviet Congress would be an impermissible and even fatal step
for the proletariat and the revolution.’
(China Miéville, October: The Story of the Russian Revolution, London 2017)
17
October
Resolution by a general meeting of peasants, Petrograd province, 17 October
1917
We henceforth and forever will not trust any longer an authority that is not
responsible to the people … The Soviet must immediately exercise all its
powers to carry out the will of the revolutionary people:
1. Immediately propose to all the countries warring with us, as well as to
our allies, an honest democratic peace…
2. Immediately declare all the land public…
3. Immediately institute state control over capital and production…
8. Immediately repeal the death penalty, which brings shame upon
revolutionary Russia before the revolutionary democracy of the entire world.
Chairman of the assembly, A.P. Vorobyov
(Mark D. Steinberg, Voices of Revolution, 1917, New Haven and London 2001)
18
October
Kamenev’s Letter in Gorky’s paper Novaya Zhizn
Not only Zinoviev and I, but also a number of practical comrades, think that
to take the initiative in an armed insurrection at the present moment … is
an inadmissible step ruinous to the proletariat and the Revolution. To stake
everything on insurrection in the coming days would be an act of despair. And
our party is too strong, it has too great a future before us, to take such a
step.
(Victor Sebestyen, Lenin the Dictator: An Intimate Portrait, London 2017)
Letter
from Lenin to the Members of the Bolshevik Party
Comrades,
I have not yet been able to receive the Petrograd papers for Wednesday, October
18. When the full text of Kamenev’s and Zinoviev’s declaration, published in
Novaya Zhizn, which is not a Party paper, was transmitted to me by telephone, I
refused to believe it … Just think of it! It is known in Party circles
that the Party since September has been discussing the question of
insurrection. Nobody has ever heard of a single letter or leaflet written by
either of the person named! Now, on the eve, one might say, of the Congress of
Soviets, two prominent Bolsheviks come out against the majority, and,
obviously, against the Central Committee … I should consider it
disgraceful on my part if I were to hesitate to condemn these former comrades
because of my former close relations with them. I declare outright that I no
longer consider either of them comrades and that I will fight with all my
might, both in the Central Committee and at the Congress, to secure their
expulsion from the Party.
( The Russian Revolution: Writings and Speeches from the February
Revolution to the October Revolution, London 1938)
19
October
Diary entry of Joshua Butler Wright, Counselor of the American Embassy,
Petrograd
The Petrograd situation is distinctly threatening! The Bolsheviks are well
armed and the temper of the army and the fleet rapidly getting worse … The
actions of the sailors are fearful — the subordinates of a most popular officer
at Oesel raped his wife and daughter and then killed them — upon his return the
officer shot himself.
(Witness to Revolution: The Russian Revolution Diary and Letters of J. Butler
Wright, London 2002)
20
October
Kerensky to Vladimir Nabokov
I would be prepared to offer prayers to produce this uprising. I have
greater forces than necessary. They will be utterly crushed.
(Orlando Figes, A People’s Tragedy, London 1996)
Diary
of Nicholas II
Today is the 23rd anniversary of dear Papa’s death, what circumstances are
we forced to live it in! God, how sad I feel for poor Russia!
(Sergei Mironenko, A Lifelong Passion, London 1996)
21
October
Diary entry of Louis de Robien, attaché at the French Embassy
After an excellent performance of La Passrelle, in which Mlle Didier was
charming and Hasti screamingly funny in the part of a manservant, I went to end
the evening in the house of young Countess Keller. There I heard that old
Princess Urussov arrived this morning from Lapotkovo, her estate at Tula; she
fled from there without being able to take anything except the clothes which
she stood up in. The peasants have burned and pillaged everything.
(Louis de Robien, The Diary of a Diplomat in Russia 1917–1918, London 1969)
21
October 2017
The closer you get to the action the more the dust gets in your eyes. For those
living through the turbulent events of October 1917 every day was a whirligig
of rumour, half-truth and speculation. Those who were supposedly in control,
like Kerensky, were left twisting in the wind (see his professed desire for an
uprising which would be ‘utterly crushed’), while Lenin was busy fulminating
against his pusillanimous colleagues Kamenev and Zinoviev. The establishment of
the Military Revolutionary Committee was a key moment: the uprising now had
some real muscle behind it. Four days and counting…
The New Statesman has marked the Great October this week with another article by the historian David Reynolds. He takes a look at the Russian century 1917–2017, and identifies five major upheavals: the February revolution (which ‘came as almost a relief for the British government’, no longer having to fight alongside the world’s leading autocracy), swiftly followed by October (which led to five years of civil war and established the polarised ideologies that characterised the twentieth century); Stalin’s brutal attempts to create a modern USSR (‘We are 50 or 100 years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years … or we shall go under’); ‘Hitler’s revolution’, meaning the impact of the 1941–45 war on the people of the Soviet Union; Khrushchev’s revolution in education and housing (which for the first time enabled Soviet citizens to discuss their lives freely in their own, non-communal, kitchens); and Gorbachev — the revolutionary nature of whose rule ‘is beyond dispute’. And what of Putin? Reynolds’ thesis is that quiet revolutions are no less significant than the dramatic days of February or October. And that just as Khrushchev’s reforms led eventually to greater freedoms under Gorby, so now ‘social media has been quietly transforming urban Russia for several years. Here is the latest phase of glasnost — again rarely noted in Britain.’ The author, wisely, does not try to predict the outcome of this latest revolution.
