16-29 April 1917
- By Mark Sutcliffe
- •
- 28 Apr, 2017
- •

The first, rather halfhearted, Bolshevik bid for power
occurred in April, less than three weeks after Lenin’s return. The pretext was
a disagreement between the government and the Soviet over war aims. The Soviet
wanted to pursue the war till victory, but to conclude it with a peace without
‘annexations and indemnities’. Miliukov, the Foreign Minister, had different
ideas, desiring to claim for Russia the Turkish Straits and Constantinople
promised her by the Allies in 1915, when they feared she might drop out of the
war. Conflicting signals sent by the government on this matter led to street
demonstrations by military units brought out by radical junior officers. The
Bolsheviks joined these disturbances under slogans calling for the resignation
of the government in favour of the Soviet. General Lavr Kornilov, the Commander
of the Petrograd Military District, asked the cabinet for permission to
suppress the riot by force, but this was denied, and order was restored by agreement
with the Ispolkom. Disgusted with the government’s indecision, Kornilov asked
to be relieved of his duties and assigned to the front. He would be heard from
again. Evaluating the lessons of April, Lenin concluded that the Bolsheviks had
been ‘insufficiently revolutionary’ in their tactics.
(Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, London 1995)
16 April
Memoir of Pierre Gilliard, tutor to the Tsar's children
In the evening a long conversation with Their Majesties on
the subject of Alexei’s lessons. We must find a way out since we have no longer
any tutors. The Tsar is going to make himself responsible for History and
Geography, the Tsarina will take charge of his religious instruction. The other
subjects will be shared between Baroness Buxhoeveden (English), Mlle. Schneider
(Arithmetic), Dr Botkin (Russian) and myself.
(Sergei Mironenko, A Lifelong Passion, London 1996)
17 April
Letter from Sofia Yudina in Petrograd to her friend Nina Agafonnikova in Vyatka
My dear Ninochka! Thank you for your letter! … In general
I’m very downhearted, I’ve almost a permanent headache, which I discern now and again, and there’s
so little air, it feels so enclosed and stuffy, one feels wretched … How we’ll
get to [Polyana] I’ve no idea: Papa wants to go but they can’t make up their
mind. It’s true that getting tickets and going is another thing altogether. To
register you have to stand in line for three days near the ticket office – day
and night: a queue to register to get a ticket!... Living at Polyana, far from
what’s going on, will be hard, but I just want to disappear somewhere … How
difficult one’s personal, internal life is at the moment.
(Viktor Berdinskikh, Letters from Petrograd: 1916-1919, St Petersburg 2016)
18 April
Communication by P.N. Miliukov, Minister of Foreign Affairs,
to the Russian Diplomats in the Allied Countries
Our enemies have striven lately to sow discord among our
Allies by propagating absurd reports regarding the alleged intention of Russia
to conclude a separate peace with the Central Powers … Firmly convinced of the
victorious issue of the present war, and in perfect agreement with our Allies,
the Provisional Government is likewise confident that the problems which were
created by this war will be solved by the creation on a firm basis of a lasting
peace, and that, inspired by identical sentiments, the Allied Democrats will
find means of establishing the guarantees and penalties necessary to prevent
any recourse to sanguinary war in the future.
(Russian-American Relations March 1917-March 1920, New York 1920)
Diary entry of Nicholas II
Abroad it’s the 1 May today, so our blockheads decided to
celebrate with street processions, musical choirs and red flags. Apparently
they came right into the park and placed wreaths on the tomb. The weather
changed for the worse during these celebrations, and thick wet snow started to
fall! I went out for a walk at 3.45, when everything was over and the sun had
come out. Worked for an hour and a half with Tatiana. In the evening I started
to read aloud to the children: A
Millionaire Girl.
(Sergei Mironenko, A Lifelong Passion, London 1996)
20 April
Sir George Buchanan, British Ambassador
Thursday was a very critical day. In the afternoon a number
of regiments marched to the space in front of the Palais Marie, where the
Council of Ministers sits, and joined the crowd that had already assembled
there to demonstrate against the Government. Cries of ‘Down with the
Government’, ‘Down with Miliukoff’, were raised, but eventually the troops were
persuaded to return to their barracks. Later in the evening there were
counter-demonstrations directed chiefly against Lenin and his adherents, and
after several Ministers had addressed the crowd from the balcony of the palace
the tide turned in their favour … A collision took place on the Nevski between
a pro-Lenin and an anti-Lenin crowd, in which several persons were killed and
wounded. Between 9 and 10.30 P.M. I had to go out three times on the balcony of
the Embassy to receive ovations and to address crowds who were demonstrating
for the Government and the Allies. During one of them a free fight took place
between the supporters of the Government and the Leninites.
(Sir George Buchanan, My Mission to Russia, London 1923)
Memoir by the Menshevik Nikolai Sukhanov
An immense crowd of workers, some of them armed, was moving
towards Nevsky from the Vyborg side. There were also a lot of soldiers with
them … Tremendous excitement reigned generally in the working-class districts,
the factories, and the barracks. Many factories were idle. Local meetings were
taking place everywhere. All this on account of Miliukov’s Note, which had
appeared that day in all the newspapers.
(N.N. Sukhanov, The Russian Revolution 1917: a Personal Record, Oxford 1955)
21 April
Appeal by the Executive Committee of the Soviet of Workers’
and Soldiers’ Deputies
Citizens: At the moment when the fate of the country is
being decided, every hasty step threatens us with danger. Demonstrations
arising from the note of the Government regarding foreign policy resulted in
clashes on the streets. There are wounded and killed. For the sake of the
salvation of the revolution from the threatening confusion, we are making a
passionate appeal to you: Preserve quiet, order and discipline.
(Mark D. Steinberg, Voices of Revolution, 1917, New Haven and London 2001)
23 April
Diary entry of Louis de Robien, attaché at the French Embassy
The state of anarchy is confirmed and extends further and
further every day. Petrograd is no longer the only centre: it’s the same
everywhere, in Moscow, in Kiev, and confusion and disorder reign. The two
influences of the government and of the Committee cancel each other out, and
the result of this double authority is chaos and anarchy. Everyone does as he
pleases, and from now on it is useless to count on any concerted effort from
Russia.
(Louis de Robien, The Diary of a Diplomat in Russia 1917-1918, London 1969)
24 April
Cable from Samuel Gompers, President of the American
Federation of Labor, to the Executive Committee of the Petrograd Soviet of
Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies
In view of the grave crisis through which the Russian people
are passing, we assure you that you can rely absolutely upon the whole-hearted
support and co-operation of the American people in the great war against our
common enemy, Kaiserism. In the fulfilment of that cause, the present American
Government has the support of 90 per cent of the American people, including the
working classes of both the cities and agricultural sections. In free America,
as in free Russia, the agitators for a peace favourable to Prussian militarism
have been allowed to express their opinions, so that the conscious and
unconscious tools of the Kaiser appear more influential than they really are …
America’s workers share the view of the Council of Workmen’s and Soldiers’
Delegates that the only way in which the German people can bring the war to an
early end is by imitating the glorious example of the Russian people,
compelling the abdication of the Hohenzollerns and the Hapsburgs and driving
the tyrannous nobility, bureaucracy, and the military caste from power.
(Russian-American Relations March 1917-March 1920, New York 1920)
Diary entry of Louis de Robien, attaché at the French Embassy
After lunch I went to see Countess Kleinmichel. The poor
woman arouses one’s pity. She has been guarded for forty days by a gang of
soldiers who stole things from her house, made holes in the pictures, ruined
the tapestries, and so on. There were sixty of them who behaved as complete
masters in her house and penetrated even to her bedroom. They let no one into
the house and they did not even allow her to see her doctor. They stole part of
her silver, and the arms which were in the smoking-room, and so on. And now,
the big drawing-room has been turned into a meeting-place for the area section
of the Workers’ and Soldiers’ Committee, with wooden trestle tables set up,
beside which the little pink chairs are arranged… The floor is filthy… no
carpet on the stairs, the tapestries have gone, and I felt sick at heart to
find the house, which was once so well kept, in this state. The Countess
received me in her bedroom. She is very brave, and views the events calmly …
She told me that she has the wherewithal to kill herself, rather than be
murdered if fresh troubles arise. ‘After all,’ she said, ‘I have lived for
seventy years; it’s not everyone who reaches this age: one must know how to
die.’
(Louis de Robien, The Diary of a Diplomat in Russia 1917-1918, London 1969)
26 April
Letter to the Petrograd Soviet from the peasants of
Rakalovsk Volost, Viatka Province
We, the undersigned peasants, citizens of Viatka Prov., …
having gathered on 26 April 1917 in a volost assembly, have deliberated, and
have decided to send the following to the Soviet of Soldiers’ and Workers’
Deputies, with a copy to the Provisional Government: Our 1st thought and
decision is the following: for us not to have a tsar, because we have now found
out that they were always enemies of the people, and the last tsar also carried
on a friendship with the Germans… Our 2nd thought is the land; the land must be
transferred to those who labour on it. Cabinet, appanage, monastery, church,
and major estate owners’ lands must be surrendered to the people without
compensation, for they were earned not by labour but by various amorous
escapades, not to mention through sly and devious behaviour around the tsar. …
Our 3rd thought is about liberty. We are sick and tired of living in debt and
slavery. We want space and light. We need for our young people to be taught in
higher schools – this is necessary but it must be at the state’s expense,
because we don’t have money of our own: the tsars have collected so much from
us, and they hired guards using our money, and they lashed us with whips for
every word of truth, and for reading books in which the truth was written, they
put us in prison. And thus we demand freedom of speech, the press, assembly,
unions and strikes, and the inviolability of the person … Our 4th thought is a
terrible one – about the war. We are sick and tired of it, we pity our
brothers, fathers, and sons, and we regret their blood, but we need to beat the
German because he wants to encroach on our freedom. We will die rather than
give him our freedom…Next, we have read in the newspapers that they want to
deport Nicholas II to England and set pensions for high dignitaries, the old
enemies of the people, and therefore we ask that the Soviet of Soldiers’ and
Workers’ Deputies under no circumstances allow the former tsar to be deported
to England…
Sincerely yours, Citizen-peasants, 130 illiterate men
(Mark D. Steinberg, Voices of Revolution, 1917, New Haven and London 2001)
27 April
Diary entry of Georges-Maurice Paléologue, French Ambassador to Russia
Countess Adam Lamoyska, who arrived here from Kiev
yesterday, tells me that she dare not return to her family place at Petchara,
in Podolia, which has been her refuge since the invasion of Poland; a dangerous
agitation is on foot among the peasants. ‘Hitherto’, she told me, ‘they have
all been faithful and attached to my mother, who has certainly done everything
she could for them. But since the revolution everything has changed. We see
them standing about at the castle gate or in the park, pretending to divide up
our lands in dumb show. One of them will affect to want the wood by the river;
another puts in for the gardens and proposes to turn them into folds. They go
on talking like that for hours and do not stop even when my mother, one of my
sisters or myself go up to them.’ The same attitude is observable in all the
provinces, so it is clear that Lenin’s propaganda among the peasants is
beginning to bear fruit. In the eyes of the moujiks, that great reform of 1861,
the emancipation of the serfs, has always been regarded as a prelude to the
general expropriation they have been obstinately expecting for centuries; their
idea is that the partition of all land, the ‘tcherny peredel’ or ‘black
partition’, as they call it, is due to them by virtue of a natural,
imprescriptible and primordial right. Lenin’s apostles have an easy task in
persuading them that the hour for this last act of justice is at length about
to strike.
(Maurice Paléologue, An Ambassador's Memoirs 1914-1917,
London 1973)
28 April
Memoir of Olga Paley
I must admit that I really didn’t want to leave the country.
But mainly to persuade the grand duke
[her morganatic husband Grand Duke Paul,
Nicholas II’s uncle] to leave, I requested a meeting with the all-powerful
Kerensky. He apologised in his response – the only time he was polite – and
said that he was too busy and could not come to me, but he would receive me in
the Large Palace at Tsarskoe Selo. Fairly nervous, I went through to the rooms that used to be occupied by
the Minister of Court Count Fredericks and his wife, where I often used to go.
Some sort of aide with long greasy, slicked down hair, wearing pince-nez and a
handkerchief of dubious cleanliness wrapped round an abscess, met me and
conducted me to the office. I waited five minutes. Finally Kerensky appeared
and in a casual, familiar tone invited me to sit down. I immediately explained
the reason for my visit. ‘I’ve come to ask permission to leave Russia: the
Grand Duke Paul, our children and myself.’ ‘Leave?’, Kerensky responded
sharply. ‘For where?’ ‘France, where we have a house and friends, and where we
can still be happy.’ ‘No’, he answered. ‘I cannot allow you to leave for
France. What would the Soviets of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies say if I
allowed the grand duke to leave, the former grand duke’, he immediately
corrected himself. ‘You can go to the Caucasus, to Crimea, to Finland, but not
to France.’ ‘So, you need us, do you?’ I asked. ‘Well, as far as I’m concerned
I’d let you go right away, but what will the Soviets say?’ I wanted to get up
but he stopped me and launched into a scathing attack on the autocratic state,
which according to him was responsible for so many crimes and unlawful acts. I
had only one thought - to get away from this pitiful person as quickly as
possible and never ever see him again.
(Cited in A.F. Kerensky: Pro et Contra, St Petersburg
2016)
29 April
Lenin, ‘On the present political situation’, speech at the
All-Russian Conference of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party
(Bolsheviks)
The Russian Revolution is only the first stage of the first
of the proletarian revolutions that are inevitably being brought about by the
war. In all the countries there grows a rebellious spirit among large masses of
the people against the capitalist class, and there grows the consciousness of
the proletariat that only the passing of power into its hands, and the
abolition of private property in the means of production, will save humanity
from ruin. In all countries, especially in the most advanced, England and
Germany, hundreds of Socialists who have not gone over to the side of ‘their’
national bourgeoisie, have been thrown into prison by the governments of
capitalism which have thus given an object lesson that they are afraid of the
proletarian revolution which is growing in the depths of the masses of the
people.
(The Russian Revolution by V.I. Lenin and Joseph Stalin: Writings and Speeches from the February Revolution to the October Revolution, 1917, London 1938)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29 April 2017
The first-hand accounts of the period between the two revolutions of 1917 give an overriding sense of hope and fear, expectation and almost simultaneous disappointment. Kerensky gives greater freedoms to the ordinary soldier, but the ordinary soldier decides he's had enough of fighting a war against people he now realises are no different to himself. The streets are the forum for political argument and discourse, while those associated with the old regime are beginning to think they must leave the country altogether. The parallels are becoming a little tired, perhaps, but momentous events, like Britain's exit from the European Union, seem to be accompanied or presaged by a heightened level of background noise; there is a sense of expectation, people are talking, worrying, planning. Looking back at the inter-revolution months, Boris Pasternak described it as a golden period, when 'the air was seized from end to end with fervid inspiration': 'A multitude of excited, keenly watchful souls would stop one another, flock together, form crowds and think aloud "in council", as they would have said in the old days [...]. The infectious universality of their elation blurred the boundaries between man and nature. In that famous summer of 1917, in the interval between two revolutionary periods, it seemed that the roads, the trees and the stars were rallying and speechifying right along with the people. The air was seized from end to end with fervid inspiration that blazed for thousands of versts - it appeared to be a person with a name, to be clairvoyant and possessed of a soul' (1917: Stories and Poems from the Russian Revolution, London 2016).

8 October
Letter from Lenin to the Bolshevik Comrades attending the Regional Congress of
the Soviets of the Northern Region
Comrades, Our revolution is passing through a highly critical period …
A gigantic task is being imposed upon the responsible leaders of our Party,
failure to perform which will involve the danger of a total collapse of the
internationalist proletarian movement. The situation is such that verily,
procrastination is like unto death … In the vicinity of Petrograd and in
Petrograd itself — that is where the insurrection can, and must, be decided on
and effected … The fleet, Kronstadt, Viborg, Reval, can and must advance
on Petrograd; they must smash the Kornilov regiments, rouse both the capitals,
start a mass agitation for a government which will immediately give the land to
the peasants and immediately make proposals for peace, and must overthrow
Kerensky’s government and establish such a government. Verily, procrastination
is like unto death.
(V.I. Lenin and Joseph Stalin, The Russian Revolution: Writings and Speeches
from the February Revolution to the October Revolution, 1917, London 1938)
9 October
Report in The Times
The Maximalist [Bolshevik], M. Trotsky, President of the Petrograd Soviet,
made a violent attack on the Government, describing it as irresponsible and
assailing its bourgeois elements, ‘who,’ he continued, ‘by their attitude are
causing insurrection among the peasants, increasing disorganisation and trying
to render the Constituent Assembly abortive.’ ‘The Maximalists,’ he declared,
‘cannot work with the Government or with the Preliminary Parliament, which I am
leaving in order to say to the workmen, soldiers, and peasants that Petrograd,
the Revolution, and the people are in danger.’ The Maximalists then left the
Chamber, shouting, ‘Long live a democratic and honourable peace! Long live the
Constituent Assembly!’
(‘Opening of Preliminary Parliament’, The Times)
10 October
As Sukhanov left his home for the Soviet on the morning of the 10th, his
wife Galina Flakserman eyed nasty skies and made him promise not to try to
return that night, but to stay at his office … Unlike her diarist husband,
who was previously an independent and had recently joined the Menshevik left,
Galina Flakserman was a long-time Bolshevik activist, on the staff of Izvestia.
Unbeknownst to him, she had quietly informed her comrades that comings and
goings at her roomy, many-entranced apartment would be unlikely to draw
attention. Thus, with her husband out of the way, the Bolshevik CC came
visiting. At least twelve of the twenty-one-committee were there … There
entered a clean-shaven, bespectacled, grey-haired man, ‘every bit like a
Lutheran minister’, Alexandra Kollontai remembered. The CC stared at the
newcomer. Absent-mindedly, he doffed his wig like a hat, to reveal a familiar
bald pate. Lenin had arrived.
(China Miéville, October: The Story of the Russian Revolution, London 2017)
Memoir by the Menshevik Nikolai
Sukhanov
Oh, the novel jokes of the merry muse of History! This supreme and decisive
session took place in my own home … without my knowledge … For such a
cardinal session not only did people come from Moscow, but the Lord of Hosts
himself, with his henchman, crept out of the underground. Lenin appeared in a
wig, but without his beard. Zinoviev appeared with a beard, but without his
shock of hair. The meeting went on for about ten hours, until about 3 o’clock
in the morning … However, I don’t actually know much about the exact
course of this meeting, or even about its outcome. It’s clear that the question
of an uprising was put … It was decided to begin the uprising as quickly
as possible, depending on circumstances but not on the Congress.
(N.N. Sukhanov, The Russian Revolution 1917: a Personal Record, Oxford 1955)
11 October
British Consul Arthur Woodhouse in a letter home
Things are coming to a pretty pass here. I confess I should like to be out
of it, but this is not the time to show the white feather. I could not ask for
leave now, no matter how imminent the danger. There are over 1,000 Britishers
here still, and I and my staff may be of use and assistance to them in an
emergency.
(Helen Rappaport, Caught in the Revolution: Petrograd 1917, London 2017)
Memoir of Fedor Raskolnikov, naval
cadet at Kronstadt
The proximity of a proletarian rising in Russia, as prologue to the world
socialist revolution, became the subject of all our discussions in
prison … Even behind bars, in a stuffy, stagnant cell, we felt instinctively
that the superficial calm that outwardly seemed to prevail presaged an
approaching storm … At last, on October 11, my turn [for release]
came … Stepping out of the prison on to the Vyborg-Side embankment and
breathing in deeply the cool evening breeze that blew from the river, I felt
that joyous sense of freedom which is known only to those who have learnt to
value it while behind bards. I took a tram at the Finland Station and quickly
reached Smolny … In the mood of the delegates to the Congress of Soviets
of the Northern Region which was taking place at that time .. an unusual
elation, an extreme animation was noticeable … They told me straightaway
that the CC had decided on armed insurrection. But there was a group of
comrades, headed by Zinoviev and Kamenev, who did not agree with this decision
and regarded a rising a premature and doomed to defeat.
(F.F. Raskolnikov, Kronstadt and Petrograd in 1917, New York 1982, first
published 1925)
12 October
Sir George Buchanan, British Ambassador to Russia
On [Kerensky] expressing the fear that there was a strong anti-Russian
feeling both in England and France, I said that though the British public was
ready to make allowances for her difficulties, it was but natural that they
should, after the fall of Riga, have abandoned all hope of her continuing to
take an active part in the war … Bolshevism was at the root of all the
evils from which Russia was suffering, and if he would but eradicate it he
would go down to history, not only as the leading figure of the revolution, but
as the saviour of his country. Kerensky admitted the truth of what I had said,
but contended that he could not do this unless the Bolsheviks themselves
provoked the intervention of the Government by an armed uprising.
(Sir George Buchanan, My Mission to Russia, London 1923)
13 October
Diary entry of Louis de Robien, attaché at the French Embassy
Kerensky is becoming more and more unpopular, in spite of certain grotesque
demonstrations such as this one: the inhabitants of a district in Central
Russia have asked him to take over the supreme religious power, and want to
make him into a kind of Pope as well as a dictator, whereas even the Tsar was
really neither one nor the other. Nobody takes him seriously, except in the
Embassy. A rather amusing sonnet about him has appeared, dedicated to the beds
in the Winter Palace, and complaining that they are reserved for hysteria
cases … for Alexander Feodorovich (Kerensky’s first names) and then
Alexandra Feodorovna (the Empress).
(Louis de Robien, The Diary of a Diplomat in Russia 1917–1918, London 1969)
14 October 2017
The BBC2 semi-dramatisation of how the Bolsheviks took power, shown this week,
was a curious thing. Talking heads in the form of Figes, Mieville, Rappaport,
Sebag-Montefiore, Tariq Ali, Martin Amis and others were interspersed with
moody reconstructions of late-night meetings, and dramatic moments such as
Lenin’s unbearded return to the Bolshevik CC (cf Sukhanov above). The programme
felt rather staged and unconvincing, with a lot of agonised expressions and
fist-clenching by Lenin, but the reviewers liked it. Odd, though, that
Eisenstein’s storming of the Winter Palace is rolled out every time, with a
brief disclaimer that it’s a work of fiction and yet somehow presented as
historical footage. There’s a sense of directorial sleight of hand, as if the
rather prosaic taking of the palace desperately needs a re-write. In some
supra-historical way, Eisenstein’s version has become the accepted version.
John Reed’s Ten Days that Shook the World
, currently being
serialised on Radio 4, is also presented with tremendous vigour, and properly
so as the book is nothing if not dramatic. Historical truth, though, is often
as elusive in a book that was originally published — in 1919 — with an
introduction by Lenin. ‘Reed was not’, writes one reviewer, ‘an ideal observer.
He knew little Russian, his grasp of events was sometimes shaky, and his facts
were often suspect.’ Still, that puts him in good company, and Reed is
undoubtedly a good read.